If you don't know anything about Liz Phair here is a short history. In 1993 she realeased Exile in Guyville and it was considered and still is considered one of the crowning achievements in indie music. She became a huge success in the underground, especially with women, specifically feminists and got a loyal following. She followed Exile up with Whip-Smart a year later and it essentially fell flat. It had been heavily promoted and sales went nowhere. On top of that critics and Exile's loyal followers weren't too impressed with the follow up.
After her third album failed to meet anyone's expectations she returned in 2003 with Liz Phair. This album was a big change for Phair as it was more pop focused. She collaborated with some big named pop producers and this enraged the Exile loyalists. The album had some success, and she followed it up in 2005 with Somebody's Miracle. Again she had some success but not enough for a major label and since she had continued in the pop realm further alienated the Exile loyalists and critics.
Now five years later she has returned. She is no longer on a big label and has now 17 years of anger built up over the curse of Exile in Guyville. I have heard interviews with Phair over the years and she has always been very frank with her frustrations over critics, her label, and the Exile loyalists. This new album is essentially a shot at all of these groups, especially her label.
I have to say I've always felt sorry for Phair and how all this played out and I actually like some of her pop stuff. For me the strength of Liz Phair has always been her whit and hooks. Exile had a very crude sound, but it was a solid pop album in many aspects. As she tried to develop her sound and add more complexity and depth the pop aspects came more clear, and in an odd way this worked against her. Personally I think it sounded better, but the Exile purists and critics never embraced it. With her sardonic lyrics she was never going to be a huge pop phenom and needed that base audience to follow her, but they didn't.
So now we get Funstyle which was available digitally back in July and has just had a full release. Some of the things I read in July were essentially saying that Liz Phair had lost her mind, but now after listening to it I think it's just 17 years of frustration coming to the surface.
With no big label for production help she's back to a more stripped down sound and with 17 years of anger built up she pretty much let's lose. In many ways her anger tops everything here and that's why we get songs like "Bollywood" a rap song with Phair going after the record industry. When you get away from those songs and you focus on the heart of this album you find that Liz Phair is still writing smart songs with good hooks and so not much has changed.
I could see playing this album on a trip across country and would pick out some songs to go on my run mix.
Following the Rhapsody rating method I give it 2 out of 5 stars for Not Bad.
Excellent review. I wasn't paying attention to music in 1993 so I never went through the whole "Exile in Guyville" thing. It's interesting to me that she has been so stubborn about not giving her fans the type of music they want.
ReplyDeleteI agree with GoHeath. I can understand an artist feeling so compelled to follow her/his own muse wherever that leads, regardless of the cost. I can also understand an artist feeling so compelled to make a group of people consistently happy, perhaps at terrific financial (if not critical) reward. But I can't really understand how anyone could reasonably want it both ways.
ReplyDeleteShe's an odd one. The argument I would make is that if she had had a big budget and pop producer Exile in Guyville would have sounded completely different. I think the critics and the loyalists need to open their eyes to this, but they never will.
ReplyDeletewell, i don't know about you critics, but i think we loyalists (i'm speaking of we loyalists universal, not necessarily the Liz Phair loyalists specifically) are off the hook. our only job is to decide whether we enjoy something. i understand the logic that an album that i loved that happened to be made in a basement studio constructed of styrofoam egg cartons would've sounded different than had that album been made in some zillion-dollar facility in nashville. but understanding that doesn't obligate me to cooton to the zillion-dollar version.
ReplyDeletecotton. not "cooton." though that seems like it should be a word, too.
ReplyDeleteWell I liked early U2, but after Joshua Tree they had a choice. Either keep on this road or try something different. They chose to go different. I had no more interest in them, but I didn't hate them and I understood their choice. Once you make Joshua Tree you can't remake it. Once Liz Phair made Exile she couldn't remake it,she had to try different things. I never have understood why the Exile loyalists hated her for it.
ReplyDelete